Donkey Kong // Universal City Studios Vs. Nintendo

Gameplay screenshot for the arcade game Donkey Kong (1981)

 Donkey Kong is an arcade game released by Nintendo in 1981. An early example of the platform game genre, the gameplay focuses on maneuvering the main character across a series of platforms while dodging and jumping over obstacles. In the game, Mario (originally named Mr. Video and then Jumpman) must rescue  named Pauline (originally named Lady), from a giant ape named Donkey Kong. The hero and ape later became two of Nintendo's most popular and recognizable characters. Donkey Kong is one of the most important games from the golden age of arcade video games as well as one of the most popular arcade games of all time.

 Universal Studios filed a lawsuit against Nintendo for copyright infringement in 1982, claiming video game creator Shigeru Miyamoto had based Donkey Kong’s story and characters on King Kong, the movie studio’s intellectual property. Nintendo fought the lawsuit and claimed that King Kong was in the public domain after it was revealed that Universal sued RKO—the movie studio that made the original 1933 film—over King Kong’s film rights. At the time, Universal also claimed that King Kong was in the public domain when they made the remake in 1976.

Facts:

 During trial, the judge actually had to play Donkey Kong and watch King Kong movies to determine if there were similarities between the two.  The Judge concluded that “the differences between them were great”, that the Donkey Kong game was “comical” and the Donkey Kong gorilla character was “farcical, childlike and nonsexual.” In contrast, the court described the King Kong character and story as “a ferocious gorilla in quest of a beautiful woman.” In summary, the court concluded that “Donkey Kong creates a totally different concept and feel from the drama of King Kong” and that at best, Donkey Kong was a parody of King Kong. If a mark is a parody of another mark, it is an exception to trademark infringement.

 But even more important than these conclusions from the judge, Nintendo discovered that Universal did not actually own King Kong because it didn’t really have any ownership over it. Nintendo also found out that Universal previously won another court case proving that King Kong was in public domain, which allowed Universal to use King Kong in its 1970s movie remake of the same name. This discovery along with the other arguments and conclusions by the Court made the case for Nintendo. Universal appealed their case up to the U.S Supreme Court seeking to overturn the trial court’s decision in favor of Nintendo, but was ultimately an exercise in futility. Nintendo was adjudged the winner of the case and was awarded an amount of $1.8 Million dollars.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pong // Magnavox Vs. Atari

Image
Gameplay screenshot of the arcade game Pong(1972) In 1972, Atari’s electronic table tennis game  Pong  became a bonafide craze—and Ralph Baer, inventor of the Magnavox Odyssey gaming console, sought legal action against Atari. Baer claimed that Atari co-founder Nolan Bushnell had copied Magnavox’s version of electronic Ping-Pong after Bushnell played the game at a Magnavox dealership demo a few months before  Pong  was released. Facts: In 1975 Ralph Baer and Magnavox, creators of the first home console system – the Magnavox Odyssey – sued Atari (and many other companies) for their clones of the Magnavox Odyssey’s ‘Tennis’ game. The Atari game in question was ‘Pong.’ Due to the patents held by Baer and Magnavox parent company Sanders Associates, and coupled with the fact that there was ample evidence of Atari founder Nolan Bushnell having played ‘Tennis’ at a product exhibition, Atari decided to settle the case outside of the courts. Other companies were also forced
Read more

Pac-Man and K.C. Munchkin // Atari Vs. Philips

Image
Gameplay screenshot for the arcade game Pac-man(1980) In the early 1980s,  Pac-Man  was the most popular video game in the world, and its manufacturers, Namco and Midway, were developing a home version port of it for the Atari 2600. But a year before Atari’s release, Magnavox and Philips Electronics debuted the video game  K.C. Munchkin , which resembled Pac-Man’s gameplay, for the Philips Videopac home console. While  K.C. Munchkin  was not a direct clone of  Pac-Man , its winding levels and its ghost-like monsters bore an uncanny resemblance to the Atari game. In 1982, Atari sued Philips for copyright infringement and an appellate court found that Philips had copied  Pac-Man . The Court’s ruling was the first to recognize how copyright law would apply to the look and feel of computer software. Facts: The court noted many differences and similarities between PAC-MAN and K.C. Munchkin, which are reproduced in their entireties below. However, what is interesting in this ca
Read more

New Super Mario Bros Wii // Nintendo Vs. Burt

Image
Artwork For New Super Mario Bros.Wii For Nintendo Wii New Super Mario Bros. Wii  is a  2D side-scrolling   platform video game  developed and published by  Nintendo  for the  Wii .    It is a sequel to  New Super Mario Bros.  for the  Nintendo DS  and a part of the  New Super Mario Bros.  series. It was released in 2009. In November 2009, 24-year-old Australian James Burt purchased a copy of  New Super Mario Bros. Wii  several days before its release, as the store had mistakenly put it up for sale early, and ripped and uploaded the game disk online. Nintendo took down the game and sued Burt shortly afterwards, accusing him of violating copyright laws and depriving Nintendo of potential sales. The case was ultimately settled in January 2010, with Burt receiving a fine of AU$1.5 million as compensation for lost sales, as well as an additional fine of AU$100,000 as a part of Nintendo's legal fine.  The file was downloaded more than 50,000 times over the course of five d
Read more